Join us for an engaging webinar co-hosted with the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) exploring locally led adaptation strategies in informal urban settings, inspired by the paper, “Community-led Adaptation: Lessons from Informal Settlements.”
Published by the Global Partnership for Results-Based Approaches (GPRBA) in April 2025, this paper shows how empowering communities to lead climate adaptation can bridge financing gaps and drive more resilient, equitable urban development.
Webinar participants will gain a deeper understanding of how integrating community-driven approaches into urban policy and investment design can drive sustainable adaptation, foster inclusion, and deliver impactful results in vulnerable urban areas. The discussion will feature key findings from the paper with a focus on informal settlements in East and West Africa, and interactive Q&A with experts and practitioners.
Whether you are a policymaker, practitioner, researcher, or advocate, this webinar will offer valuable perspectives on embedding inclusive processes in urban spaces to advance adaptation.
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk.
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk.
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk.
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk.
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk. Read the synthesis note
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk. Read the synthesis note
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk.
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk. Learn more
From Madagascar to the Solomon Islands, this series of case studies demonstrates that LLCA is about results as much as it is about process. They show that embedding inclusive, climate-informed processes in country systems improve equity, accountability, and the ability of local actors to identify climate risks and prioritize context-specific solutions. These case studies contribute to a growing evidence base illustrating that LLCA not only reduces climate and disaster impacts but also advances wider development outcomes. This evidence will help governments, donors, and communities sustain momentum and expand investments in LLCA, ensuring climate action reaches those most at risk. Learn more
